Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Law. Show all posts

Friday, August 6, 2021

RA 11567 "Expanding Jurisdiction of Lower Courts"

 RA 11567  - "Expanding Jurisdiction of Lower Courts"

(signed July 30, 2021 by President Duterte)
 
President Duterte signed Republic Act No. 11576, which amends the Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980, or the Batas Pambansa Blg. 129. last July 30, 2021
 
first level courts (MTCs) jurisdiction:
 
* may now resolve civil actions of real property
- with an assessed value not exceeding P400,000,
- from the current P50,000 maximum.
 
* These courts will also be assigned exclusive jurisdiction
- over civil actions and probate proceedings, testate and intestate,
- including the grant of provisional remedies in proper cases,
- where the demand does not exceed P2 million.
 
* They will also have exclusive jurisdiction
- in admiralty and maritime actions
- where the demand or claim does not exceed P2 million.
 
* First level courts include
- Metropolitan Trial Courts (MeTC),
- Municipal Trial Courts in Cities (MTCC);
- Municipal Trial Courts and
- Municipal Circuit Trial Courts.
 
RTCs jurisdiction:
 
RTC's jurisdiction amount
- in all civil actions involving the title to, or possession of, real property
should exceed to P400,000,
over P2 million for actions in admiralty and maritime jurisdiction,
- and also over P2 million for all matters of probate, both testate and intestate.
 
- shall also have jurisdictional supervision over:
- “all cases in which:
* the demand
* exclusive of interest,
* damages of whatever kinds,
* attorney’s fees,
* litigation expenses and
* costs or the value of the property in controversy
exceeds P2 million.”
 
Delegation to the SC:
 
RA 11567 - delegates to the Supreme Court (SC)
- the power to further increase or decrease the jurisdictional threshold
- of the first and second level courts
- in line with the SC’s power of administrative supervision over all courts

#law #remediallaw #RA11567

Thursday, February 7, 2013

My Article Got Published at Youngblood



My article has just been published at YOUNGBLOOD, of Philippine Daily Inquirer, February 7, 2013. Page A13. Here is the link  http://opinion.inquirer.net/46373/mentally-disabled-but-not-crazy

—- Initially I don’t want to spread the word, I might be misinterpreted as mayabang but I opted to share nonetheless since I am a mental heath advocate and I want to help protect the legal rights of mentally disabled Filipinos.

Please share if you must. Thank you. Naomi.

Sunday, April 1, 2012

New Trial Rules for Quezon City Courts (A.M. No. 11-6-10-SC )

New Trial Rules for Quezon City Courts

A.M. No. 11-6-10-SC 

Download Complete PDF File: http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/admin%20matters/AM%20No%2011-6-10-SC.pdf

Below is the summary:

The Supreme Court has issued “Guidelines for Litigation in Quezon City Trial Court” (A.M. No. 11-6-10-SC, 21 February 2012), which imposes radical changes in trial procedure on a test-case basis. The obvious philosophy behind the new rules is to expedite trial. These new rules shall apply only for cases tried in Quezon City. If successful, these likely will be adopted in other courts as well.
The New Rules take effect on 16 April 2012. They shall immediately apply to new cases, and pending cases where trial has not yet started. For pending cases where trial has begun, the New Rules shall apply upon the consent of all the parties.
A copy of the New Rules is posted on the Supreme Court website. Here’s a summary of some of the more significant changes:
  • Pleadings may not exceed 40 pages in length (double-spaced, 14 font). Pleadings subsequent to a reply regarding any incident require leave of court.
  • Service of pleadings may now be accomplished by private couriers instead of registered mail. An affidavit of service from the courier is required.
  • No postponement of hearing except for acts of God or force majeure. If counsel is absent in civil cases, court proceeds with hearing ex parte and the presentation of any witness who is absent is deemed waived. 
  • Offer of evidence is to be made orally, as well as the comment thereon and the court ruling. 
  • After trial, parties required to submit memoranda not exceeding 25 pages long, single spaced, Font 14.
For civil cases:
  • Motions for summary judgment, amendment of pleadings, suspension of proceedings and dismissals under Rule 16 must be filed before pre-trial date.
  • Direct testimony of all witnesses shall be presented in Affidavits, and no additional oral direct testimony to be allowed save for witness ID and confirmation of his affidavit. Cross-examination to be conducted immediately after confirmation of the affidavit.
For criminal cases
  • Arraignment to be set within 7 days from receipt by court of case when accused is detained, 20 days if accused is not detained.
  • Suspension of arraignment due to pending petition for review with the DOJ cannot exceed 60 days. 
  • Bail application to be heard and resolved within 60 days from the first-hearing.
  • Arraignment and pre-trial to be scheduled on the same date, except in cases where mediation/dispute resolution is necessary. 
  • Parties may agree to affidavits in lieu of direct testimony; otherwise testimony is heard in open court. However, expert testimony is always given orally. 
  • After prosecution rests case, court must inquire from accused if she/he will file a demurrer. 
Non-trial related, but if you are a member of IBP-QC, you might be required to render services as counsel de oficio in relation with the free legal services offered by the IBP-QC chapter.

Source: http://attylaserna.blogspot.com/2012/03/new-trial-rules-for-quezon-city-courts.html

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

DOLE's New Rules on Contracting and Subcontracting

Department Order No. 18-A
Series of 2011

RULES IMPLEMENTING ARTICLES 106 TO 109 OF THE LABOR CODE, AS AMENDED
By virtue of the power vested in the Secretary of Labor and Employment under Articles 5 and 106 to 109 of the Labor Code of the Philippines, as amended, the following regulations governing contracting and subcontracting arrangements are hereby issued:

Section 1. Guiding principles. Contracting and subcontracting arrangements are expressly allowed by law and are subject to regulations for the promotion of employment and the observance of the rights of workers to just and humane conditions of work, security of tenure, self-organization and collective bargaining. Labor-only contracting as defined herein shall be prohibited.

Section 2. Coverage. These Rules shall apply to all parties of contracting and subcontracting arrangements where employer-employee relationships exist. It shall also apply to cooperatives engaging in contracting or subcontracting arrangements.

Contractors and subcontractors referred to in these Rules are prohibited from engaging in recruitment and placement activities as defined in Article 13(b) of the Labor Code, whether for local or overseas employment.

Section 3. Definition of terms. The following terms as used in these Rules, shall mean:
(a) “Bond/s” refers to the bond under Article 108 of the Labor Code that the principal may require from the contractor to be posted equal to the cost of labor under contract. The same may also refer to the security or guarantee posted by the principal for the payment of the services of the contractors under the Service Agreement.

(b) “Cabo” refers to a person or group of persons or to a labor group which, in the guise of a labor organization, cooperative or any entity, supplies workers to an employer, with or without any monetary or other consideration, whether in the capacity of an agent of the employer or as an ostensible independent contractor.

(c) “Contracting” or “Subcontracting” refers to an arrangement whereby a principal agrees to put out or farm out with a contractor the performance or completion of a specific job, work or service within a definite or predetermined period, regardless of whether such job, work or service is to be performed or completed within or outside the premises of the principal.

(d) “Contractor” refers to any person or entity, including a cooperative, engaged in a legitimate contracting or subcontracting arrangement providing either services, skilled workers, temporary workers, or a combination of services to a principal under a Service Agreement.

(e) “Contractor’s employee” includes one employed by a contractor to perform or complete a job, work, or service pursuant to a Service Agreement with a principal. It shall also refer to regular employees of the contractor whose functions are not dependent on the performance or completion of a specific job, work or service within a definite period of time, i.e., administrative staff.

(f) “In-house agency” refers to a contractor which is owned, managed, or controlled directly or indirectly by the principal or one where the principal owns/represents any share of stock, and which operates solely or mainly for the principal.

(g) “Net Financial Contracting Capacity (NFCC)1” refers to the formula to determine the financial capacity of the contractor to carry out the job, work or services sought to be undertaken under a Service Agreement. NFCC is current assets minus current liabilities multiplied by K, which stands for contract duration equivalent to: 10 for one year or less; 15 for more than one (1) year up to two (2) years; and 20 for more than two (2) years, minus the value of all outstanding or ongoing projects including contracts to be started.

1 Refers to the formula set out in the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 9184, or An Act Providing for the Modernization, Standardization and Regulation of the Procurement Activities of the Government and For Other Purposes.

(h) “Principal” refers to any employer, whether a person or entity, including government agencies and government-owned and controlled-corporations, who/which puts out or farms out a job, service or work to a contractor.

(i) “Right to control” refers to the right reserved to the person for whom the services of the contractual workers are performed, to determine not only the end to be achieved, but also the manner and means to be used in reaching that end.

(j) “Service Agreement” refers to the contract between the principal and contractor containing the terms and conditions governing the performance or completion of a specific job, work or service being farmed out for a definite or predetermined period.

(k) “Solidary liability” refers to the liability of the principal, pursuant to the provision of Article 109 of the Labor Code, as direct employer together with the contractor for any violation of any provision of the Labor Code.

It also refers to the liability of the principal, in the same manner and extent that he/she is liable to his/her direct employees, to the extent of the work performed under the contract when the contractor fails to pay the wages of his/her employees, as provided in Article 106 of the Labor Code, as amended.

(l) "Substantial capital” refers to paid-up capital stocks/shares of at least Three Million Pesos (P3,000,000.00) in the case of corporations, partnerships and cooperatives; in the case of single proprietorship, a net worth of at least Three Million Pesos (P3,000,000.00).

(m) “Trilateral Relationship” refers to the relationship in a contracting or subcontracting arrangement where there is a contract for a specific job, work or service between the principal and the contractor, and a contract of employment between the contractor and its workers. There are three (3) parties involved in these arrangements: the principal who decides to farm out a job, work or service to a contractor; the contractor who has the capacity to independently undertake the performance of the job, work or service; and the contractual workers engaged by the contractor to accomplish the job, work or service.
Section 4. Legitimate contracting or subcontracting. Contracting or subcontracting shall be legitimate if all the following circumstances concur:

(a) The contractor must be registered in accordance with these Rules and carries a distinct and independent business and undertakes to perform the job, work or service on its own responsibility, according to its own manner and method, and free from control and direction of the principal in all matters connected with the performance of the work except as to the results thereof;

(b) The contractor has substantial capital and/or investment; and

(c) The Service Agreement ensures compliance with all the rights and benefits under Labor Laws.

Section 5. Trilateral relationship in contracting arrangements; Solidary liability. In legitimate contracting or subcontracting arrangement there exists:

(a) An employer-employee relationship between the contractor and the employees it engaged to perform the specific job, work or service being contracted; and

(b) A contractual relationship between the principal and the contractor as governed by the provisions of the Civil Code.

In the event of any violation of any provision of the Labor Code, including the failure to pay wages, there exists a solidary liability on the part of the principal and the contractor for purposes of enforcing the provisions of the Labor Code and other social legislation, to the extent of the work performed under the employment contract.

However, the principal shall be deemed the direct employer of the contractor’s employee in cases where there is a finding by a competent authority of labor-only contracting, or commission of prohibited activities as provided in Section 7, or a violation of either Sections 8 or 9 hereof.

Section 6. Prohibition against labor-only contracting. Labor-only contracting is hereby declared prohibited. For this purpose, labor only contracting shall refer to an arrangement where:

(a) The contractor does not have substantial capital or investments in the form of tools, equipment, machineries, work premises, among others, and the employees recruited and placed are performing activities which are usually necessary or desirable to the operation of the company, or directly related to the main business of the principal within a definite or predetermined period, regardless of whether such job, work or service is to be performed or completed within or outside the premises of the principal; or

(b) The contractor does not exercise the right to control over the performance of the work of the employee.

Section 7. Other Prohibitions. Notwithstanding Section 6 of these Rules, the following are hereby declared prohibited for being contrary to law or public policy:

A. Contracting out of jobs, works or services when not done in good faith and not justified by the exigencies of the business such as the following:
(1) Contracting out of jobs, works or services when the same results in the termination or reduction of regular employees and reduction of work hours or reduction or splitting of the bargaining unit.

(2) Contracting out of work with a “Cabo”.

(3) Taking undue advantage of the economic situation or lack of bargaining strength of the contractor’s employees, or undermining their security of tenure or basic rights, or circumventing the provisions of regular employment, in any of the following instances:
(i) Requiring them to perform functions which are currently being performed by the regular employees of the principal; and

(ii) Requiring them to sign, as a precondition to employment or continued employment, an antedated resignation letter; a blank payroll; a waiver of labor standards including minimum wages and social or welfare benefits; or a quitclaim releasing the principal, contractor or from any liability as to payment of future claims.
(4) Contracting out of a job, work or service through an in-house agency.

(5) Contracting out of a job, work or service that is necessary or desirable or directly related to the business or operation of the principal by reason of a strike or lockout whether actual or imminent.

(6) Contracting out of a job, work or service being performed by union members when such will interfere with, restrain or coerce employees in the exercise of their rights to self-organization as provided in Art. 248 (c) of the Labor Code, as amended.

(7) Repeated hiring of employees under an employment contract of short duration or under a Service Agreement of short duration with the same or different contractors, which circumvents the Labor Code provisions on Security of Tenure.

(8) Requiring employees under a subcontracting arrangement to sign a contract fixing the period of employment to a term shorter than the term of the Service Agreement, unless the contract is divisible into phases for which substantially different skills are required and this is made known to the employee at the time of engagement.

(9) Refusal to provide a copy of the Service Agreement and the employment contracts between the contractor and the employees deployed to work in the bargaining unit of the principal’s certified bargaining agent to the sole and exclusive bargaining agent (SEBA).

(10) Engaging or maintaining by the principal of subcontracted employees in excess of those provided for in the applicable Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) or as set by the Industry Tripartite Council (ITC).
B. Contracting out of jobs, works or services analogous to the above when not done in good faith and not justified by the exigencies of the business.

Section 8. Rights of contractor’s employees. All contractor’s employees, whether deployed or assigned as reliever, seasonal, week-ender, temporary, or promo jobbers, shall be entitled to all the rights and privileges as provided for in the Labor Code, as amended, to include the following:
(a) Safe and healthful working conditions;

(b) Labor standards such as but not limited to service incentive leave, rest days, overtime pay, holiday pay, 13th month pay, and separation pay as may be provided in the Service Agreement or under the Labor Code;

(c) Retirement benefits under the SSS or retirement plans of the contractor, if there is any;

(d) Social security and welfare benefits;

(e) Self-organization, collective bargaining and peaceful concerted activities; and

(f) Security of tenure.
Section 9. Required contracts under these Rules.
(a) Employment contract between the contractor and its employee.

Notwithstanding any oral or written stipulations to the contrary, the contract between the contractor and its employee shall be governed by the provisions of Articles 279 and 280 of the Labor Code, as amended. It shall include the following terms and conditions:
i. The specific description of the job, work or service to be performed by the employee;

ii. The place of work and terms and conditions of employment, including a statement of the wage rate applicable to the individual employee; and

iii. The term or duration of employment that must be co-extensive with the Service Agreement or with the specific phase of work for which the employee is engaged.
The contractor shall inform the employee of the foregoing terms and conditions of employment in writing on or before the first day of his/her employment.

(b) Service Agreement between the principal and the contractor. The Service Agreement shall include the following:
i. The specific description of the job, work or service being subcontracted.

ii. The place of work and terms and conditions governing the contracting arrangement, to include the agreed amount of the services to be rendered, the standard administrative fee of not less than ten percent (10%) of the total contract cost.

iii. Provisions ensuring compliance with all the rights and benefits of the employees under the Labor Code and these Rules on: provision for safe and healthful working conditions; labor standards such as, service incentive leave, rest days, overtime pay, 13th month pay and separation pay; retirement benefits; contributions and remittance of SSS, Philhealth, PagIbig Fund, and other welfare benefits; the right to self-organization, collective bargaining and peaceful concerted action; and the right to security of tenure.

iv. A provision on the Net Financial Contracting Capacity of the contractor, which must be equal to the total contract cost.

v. A provision on the issuance of the bond/s as defined in Section 3(m) renewable every year.

vi. The contractor or subcontractor shall directly remit monthly the employers’ share and employees’ contribution to the SSS, ECC, Philhealth and Pagibig.

vii. The term or duration of engagement. The Service Agreement must conform to the DOLE Standard Computation and Standard Service Agreement, which form part of these Rules as Annexes “A” and “B”.
Section 10. Duties of the principal. Pursuant to the authority of the Secretary of Labor and Employment to restrict or prohibit the contracting of labor to protect the rights of the workers and to ensure compliance with the provisions of the Labor Code, as amended, the principal, as the indirect employer or the user of the services of the contractor, is hereby required to observe the provisions of these Rules.

Section 11. Security of tenure of contractor’s employees. It is understood that all contractor’s employees enjoy security of tenure regardless of whether the contract of employment is co-terminus with the service agreement, or for a specific job, work or service, or phase thereof.

Section 12. Observance of required standards of due process; requirements of notice. In all cases of termination of employment, the standards of due process laid down in Article 277(b) of the Labor Code, as amended, and settled jurisprudence on the matter2, must be observed. Thus, the following is hereby set out to clarify the standards of due process that must be observed:

2 King of Kings Transport, Inc., Claire dela Fuente, and Melissa Lim, vs. Santiago O. Mamac, G.R. No. 166208, (29 June 2007); and Felix B. Perez and Amante G. Doria v. Philippine Telegraph and Telephone Company and Jose Luis Santiago, G.R. No. 152048, (7 April 2009), (en banc Decision).

I. For termination of employment based on just causes as defined in Article 282 of the Code, the requirement of two written notices served on the employee shall observe the following:

(A) The first written notice should contain:
(1) The specific causes or grounds for termination;

(2) Detailed narration of the facts and circumstances that will serve as basis for the charge against the employee. A general description of the charge will not suffice;

(3) The company rule, if any, that is violated and/or the ground under Art. 282 that is being charged against the employee; and

(4) A directive that the employee is given opportunity to submit a written explanation within a reasonable period.

“Reasonable period” should be construed as a period of at least five (5) calendar days from receipt of the notice to give the employee an opportunity to study the accusation, consult a union official or lawyer, gather data and evidence, and decide on the defenses against the complaint.
(B) After serving the first notice, the employer should afford the employee ample opportunity to be heard and to defend himself/herself with the assistance of his/her representative if he/she so desires, as provided in Article 277(b) of the Labor Code, as amended.

“Ample opportunity to be heard” means any meaningful opportunity (verbal or written) given to the employee to answer the charges against him/her and submit evidence in support of his/her defense, whether in a hearing, conference or some other fair, just and reasonable way. A formal hearing or conference becomes mandatory only when requested by the employee in writing or substantial evidentiary disputes exist or a company rule or practice requires it, or when similar circumstances justify it.

(C) After determining that termination of employment is justified, the employer contractor shall serve the employee a written notice of termination indicating that: (1) all circumstances involving the charge against the employees have been considered; and (2) the grounds have been established to justify the severance of their employment. The foregoing notices shall be served on the employee’s last known address.
II. For termination of employment based on authorized causes defined in Article 283 of the Labor Code, the requirement of due process shall be deemed complied with upon service of a written notice to the employee and the appropriate regional office of the Department of Labor and Employment at least thirty days before the effectivity of the termination, specifying the ground or grounds for termination.

III. If the termination is brought about by the completion of the contract or phase thereof, no prior notice is required. If the termination is brought about by the failure of a probationary employee to meet the reasonable standards of the employer, which was made known to the employee at the time of his/her employment, it shall be sufficient that a written notice is served upon the employee within a reasonable time prior to the expiration of the probationary period.

Section 13. Effect of termination of employment. The termination of employment of the contractor employee prior to the expiration of the Service Agreement shall be governed by Articles 282, 283 and 284 of the Labor Code.

In case the termination of employment is caused by the pre-termination of the Service Agreement not due to authorized causes under Article 283, the right of the contractor employee to unpaid wages and other unpaid benefits including unremitted legal mandatory contributions, e.g., SSS, Philhealth, Pag-ibig, ECC, shall be borne by the party at fault, without prejudice to the solidary liability of the parties to the Service Agreement.

Where the termination results from the expiration of the service agreement, or from the completion of the phase of the job, work or service for which the employee is engaged, the latter may opt for payment of separation benefits as may be provided by law or the Service Agreement, without prejudice to his/her entitlement to the completion bonuses or other emoluments, including retirement benefits whenever applicable.

Section 14. Mandatory Registration and Registry of Legitimate Contractors. Consistent with the authority of the Secretary of Labor and Employment to restrict or prohibit the contracting out of labor to protect the rights of workers, it shall be mandatory for all persons or entities, including cooperatives, acting as contractors, to register with the Regional Office of the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) where it principally operates.

Failure to register shall give rise to the presumption that the contractor is engaged in labor-only contracting.

Accordingly, the registration system governing contracting arrangements and implemented by the Regional Offices of the DOLE is hereby established, with the Bureau of Working Conditions (BWC) as the central registry.

Section 15. Requirements for registration. The application for registration as a contractor shall be filed at the DOLE Regional Office in the region where it seeks to principally operate. The applicant shall provide in the application form the following information:
(a) The name and business address of the applicant and the areas where it seeks to operate;

(b) The names and addresses of officers, if the applicant is a corporation, partnership, cooperative or a labor organization;

(c) The nature of the applicant’s business and the industry or industries where the applicant seeks to operate;

(d) The number of regular workers and the total workforce;

(e) The list of clients, if any, the number of personnel assigned to each client, if any, and the services provided to the client;

(f) The description of the phases of the contract, including the number of employees covered in each phase, where appropriate; and

(g) Proof of compliance with substantial capital requirement as defined in Section 3(l) of these Rules.
The application shall be supported by:
(a) A certified true copy of a certificate of registration of firm or business name from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), Cooperative Development Authority (CDA), or from the DOLE if the applicant is a labor organization;

(b) A certified true copy of the license or business permit issued by the local government unit or units where the contractor operates;

(c) A certified listing, with proof of ownership or lease contract, of facilities, tools, equipment, premises implements, machineries and work premises, that are actually and directly used by the contractor in the performance or completion of the job, work or service contracted out. In addition, the applicant shall submit a photo of the office building and premises where it holds office;

(d) A copy of audited financial statements if the applicant is a corporation, partnership, cooperative or a labor organization, or copy of the latest ITR if the applicant is a sole proprietorship; and

(e) A sworn disclosure that the registrant, its officers and owners or principal stockholders or any one of them, has not been operating or previously operating as a contractor under a different business name or entity or with pending cases of violations of these Rules and/or labor standards, or with a cancelled registration. In case any of the foregoing has a pending case, a copy of the complaint and the latest status of the case shall be attached.

The application shall be verified. It shall include a DOLE certification of attendance to orientation seminar on these Rules and an undertaking that the contractor shall abide by all applicable labor laws and regulations.
Section 16. Filing and processing of application. The application with all supporting documents shall be filed in triplicate in the Regional Office where the applicant principally operates. No application for registration shall be accepted unless all the requirements in the preceding Section are complied with.

Section 17. Verification inspection. Within two (2) working days upon receipt of the application with complete supporting documents, the authorized representative of the Regional Director shall conduct a verification inspection of the facilities, tools, equipment, and work premises of the applicant.

Section 18. Approval or denial of the application. The Regional Office shall deny or approve the application within one (1) working day after the verification inspection.

Applications that fail to meet the requirements set forth in Section 15 of these Rules shall be denied.

Section 19. Registration fee. Payment of registration fee of Twenty-Five Thousand Pesos (P25,000.00) shall be required upon approval of the application.

Upon registration, the Regional Office shall return one set of the duly-stamped application documents to the applicant, retain one set for its file, and transmit the remaining set to the Bureau of Working Conditions (BWC) within five (5) days from registration.

Section 20. Validity of certificate of registration of contractors. The contractor shall be deemed registered only on the date of issuance of its Certificate of Registration.

The Certificate of Registration shall be effective for three (3) years, unless cancelled after due process. The same shall be valid in the region where it is registered.

In case the contractor has Service Agreements or operates outside the region where it is registered, it shall request a duly authenticated copy of its Certificate of Registration from the registering Regional Office and submit the same to the DOLE Regional Office where it seeks to operate, together with a copy of its Service Agreement/s in the area, for purposes of monitoring compliance with these Rules.

Section 21. Renewal of registration. All registered contractors shall apply for renewal of their Certificates of Registration thirty (30) days before the expiration of their registration to remain in the roster of legitimate service contractors. The applicant shall pay a registration renewal fee of Twenty-Five Thousand Pesos (P25,000.00) to the DOLE Regional Office.

Copies of all the updated supporting documents in letters (a) to (e) of Section 15 hereof shall be attached to the duly accomplished application form, including the following:

(a) Certificate of membership and proof of payment of SSS, Philhealth, BIR, ECC and Pag-Ibig contributions for the last three (3) years, as well as loan amortizations; and

(b) Certificate of pending or no pending labor standards violation case/s with the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) and Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE). The pendency of a case will not prejudice the renewal of the registration, unless there is a finding of violation of labor standards by the DOLE Regional Director.

Section 22. Semi-annual reporting. The contractor shall submit in triplicate its subscribed semi-annual report using a prescribed form to the appropriate Regional Office. The report shall include:

(a) A list of contracts entered with the principal during the subject reporting period;

(b) The number of workers covered by each contract with the principal;

(c) Proof of payment of remittances to the Social Security System (SSS), the Pag-Ibig Fund, Philhealth, Employees Compensation Commission (ECC), and Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) due its employees during the subject reporting period and of amortization of declared loans due from its employees; and

(d) A certified listing of all cases filed against the contractor before the NLRC

The Regional Office shall return one set of the duly-stamped report to the contractor, retain one set for its file, and transmit the remaining set to the Bureau of Working Conditions (BWC) within five (5) days from receipt thereof.

Section 23. Grounds for cancellation of registration. The Regional Director shall, upon a verified complaint, cancel or revoke the registration of a contractor after due process, based on any of the following grounds:

(a) Misrepresentation of facts in the application;

(b) Submission of a falsified or tampered application or supporting documents to the application for registration;

(c) Non-submission of Service Agreement between the principal and the contractor when required to do so;

(d) Non-submission of the required semi-annual report as provided in Section 22 (Semi-annual reporting) hereof;

(e) Findings through arbitration that the contractor has engaged in labor-only contracting and/or the prohibited activities as provided in Section 7 (Other Prohibitions) hereof;

(f) Non-compliance with labor standards and working conditions;

(g) Findings of violation of Section 8 (Rights of contractor’s employees) or Section 9 (Required contracts) of these Rules;

(h) Non-compliance with SSS, the HDMF, Pag-Ibig, Philhealth, and ECC laws; and

(i) Collecting any fees not authorized by law and other applicable rules and regulations.

Section 24. Due process in cancellation of registration. Complaint/s based on any of the grounds enumerated in the preceding Section against the contractor shall be filed in writing and under oath with the Regional Office which issued the Certificate of Registration.

The complaint/s shall state the following:
(a) The name/s and address/es of the complainant/s;

(b) Name and address of the contractor;

(c) The ground/s for cancellation;

(d) When and where the action complained of happened;

(e) The amount of money claim, if any; and

(f) The relief/s sought.
Upon receipt of the complaint, the Regional Director shall direct the contractor, with notice to the complainant, to file a verified answer/counter affidavit within ten (10) calendar days without extension, incorporating therein all pertinent documents in support of his/her defenses, with proof of service of a copy to the complainant. Failure to file an answer/counter affidavit shall constitute a waiver on the part of the respondent. No motion to dismiss shall be entertained.

The Regional Director or his duly authorized representative may conduct a clarificatory hearing within the prescribed ten (10) calendar days within which to file a verified answer/counter affidavit.

Within the said ten (10) calendar days period, the contractor shall make the necessary corrections/rectifications on the violations that are immediately rectifiable upon its own initiative in order to be fully compliant.

The Regional Director may avail himself of all reasonable means to ascertain the facts of the case, including conduct of inspection, where appropriate, and examination of informed persons.

The proceedings before the Regional Office shall be summary in nature.

The conduct of hearings shall be terminated within fifteen (15) calendar days from the first scheduled clarificatory hearing. The Regional Director shall resolve the case within ten (10) working days from the date of the last hearing. If there is no necessity to conduct a hearing, the case shall be resolved within ten (10) working days from receipt of the verified answer/counter affidavit.

Any motion for reconsideration from the Order of the Regional Director shall be treated as an appeal.

Section 25. Appeal. The Order of the Regional Director is appealable to the Secretary within ten (10) working days from receipt of the copy of the Order. The appeal shall be filed with the Regional Office which issued the cancellation Order. The Office of the Secretary shall have thirty (30) working days from receipt of the records of the case to resolve the appeal. The Decision of the Secretary shall become final and executory after ten (10) days from receipt thereof by the parties. No motion for reconsideration of the Decision shall be entertained.

Section 26. Effects of cancellation of registration. A final Order of cancellation shall divest the contractor of its legitimate status to engage in contracting/subcontracting.

Such Order of cancellation shall be a ground to deny an application for renewal of registration to a contractor under the Rules.

The cancellation of the registration of the contractor for engaging in labor-only contracting or for violation of any of the provisions of these Rules involving a particular Service Agreement will not, however, impair the validity of existing legitimate jobcontracting arrangements the contractor may have entered into with other principals prior to the cancellation of its registration. Any valid and subsisting Service Agreement shall be respected until its expiration; thereafter, contracting with a delisted contractor shall make the principal direct employer of all employees under the Service Agreement pursuant to Articles 106 and 109 of the Labor Code.

Section 27. Effects of finding of labor-only contracting and/or violation of Sections 7. 8 or 9 of the Rules. A finding by competent authority of labor-only contracting shall render the principal jointly and severally liable with the contractor to the latter's employees, in the same manner and extent that the principal is liable to employees directly hired by him/her, as provided in Article 106 of the Labor Code, as amended.

A finding of commission of any of the prohibited activities in Section 7, or violation of either Sections 8 or 9 hereof, shall render the principal the direct employer of the employees of the contractor or subcontractor, pursuant to Article 109 of the Labor Code, as amended.

Section 28. Retaliatory measures. Pursuant to Article 118 of the Labor Code, as amended, it shall be unlawful for the principal, contractor, or any party privy to the contract or services provided to refuse to pay or reduce the wages and benefits, and discharge or in any manner discriminate against any worker who has filed any complaint or instituted any proceeding on wages (under Title II, Book III of the Labor Code), labor standards violation, or has testified or is about to testify in such proceedings.

Section 29. Enforcement of labor standards and working conditions. Consistent with Article 128 (Visitorial and Enforcement Power) of the Labor Code, as amended, the Regional Director through his/her duly authorized representatives, shall conduct routine inspection of establishments engaged in contracting arrangement regardless of the number of employees engaged by the principal or by the contractor.

They shall have access to employer’s records and premises at any time of the day or night whenever work is being undertaken therein, and the right to copy therefrom, to question any employee and investigate any fact, condition or matter which may be necessary to determine violations or which may aid in the enforcement of the Labor Code and of any labor law, wage order, or rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto.

The findings of the duly authorized representative shall be referred to the Regional Director for appropriate action as provided for in Article 128, and shall be furnished the collective bargaining agent, if any.

Based on the visitorial and enforcement power of the Secretary of Labor and Employment in Article 128 (a), (b), (c), and (d), the Regional Director shall issue compliance orders to give effect to the labor standards provisions of the Labor Code, other labor legislation, and these Rules.

Section 30. Duty to produce copy of contract between the principal and the contractor. The principal or the contractor shall be under an obligation to produce a copy of the Service Agreement in the ordinary course of inspection. The contractor shall likewise be under an obligation to produce a copy of any contract of employment when directed to do so by the Regional Office Director or his/her authorized representative.

Section 31. Tripartite implementation and monitoring of compliance; Use of registration fees. A region-based tripartite monitoring team on the observance of labor standards in contracting and subcontracting arrangements shall be constituted as a subcommittee of the Regional Tripartite Industrial Peace Council (RTIPC) within fifteen (15) days from the effectivity of these Rules. It shall submit a quarterly regional monitoring report to the DOLE Secretary and to the National Tripartite Industrial Peace Council (NTIPC). The Bureau of Working Conditions (BWC) shall ensure the implementation of this provision, and shall conduct capacity building to the members of the regional tripartite monitoring team.

For this purpose, a portion of the collected registration fees shall be used in the operation of the region-based tripartite monitoring team, including in the development of an internet-based monitoring system and database. It shall likewise be used for transmittal of the monthly report of all registered contractors to the Bureau of Local Employment (BLE), and in generating labor market information.

Section 32. Oversight function of the National TIPC. The National Tripartite Industrial Peace Council (NTIPC) as created under Executive Order No. 49, Series of 1998, as amended, shall serve as the oversight committee to verify and monitor the following:

(a) Engagement in allowable contracting activities; and

(b) Compliance with administrative reporting requirements.

Section 33. Collective bargaining and/or Industry Tripartite Council (ITC). Nothing herein shall preclude the parties in collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) to determine the functions that can or cannot be farmed out or contracted out to a legitimate contractor, including the terms and conditions of the workers’ engagement under the arrangement, provided the provisions of these Rules are observed.

In industries with established Industry Tripartite Councils (ITCs), the tripartite partners may agree, through a voluntary code of good practices, on the functions or processes that can or cannot be contracted out to a legitimate contractor.

Section 34. Financial Relief Program; Tripartite Co-Regulation Engagement. A Financial Relief Program or Unemployment Assistance Fund shall be established for employees under a Service Agreement or employees in transition from one Service Agreement to the next. For this purpose, the National Tripartite Industrial Peace Council (NTIPC), upon the effectivity of this issuance, shall constitute a Local Service Provider Tripartite Working Group (LSP-TWG) composed of representatives of the stakeholders in the industry. The LSP-TWG shall:

(a) Recommend the mechanics and details in setting up the Financial Relief Program or Unemployment Assistance Fund with proposed funding sources before end of June 2012; and

(b) Draw-up the terms of a Tripartite Co-Regulation Engagement in ensuring full compliance with labor laws for approval/endorsement by the NTIPC, including a proposed Table of Progressive Rate of Increases in the minimum capitalization requirement at reasonable intervals to ensure that only legitimate contractors can engage in subcontracting arrangement.

Section 35. Enrollment in DOLE programs on improving compliance with labor standards. For purposes of ensuring compliance with labor standards, the principal and subcontractors covered by these Rules are encourage to enroll and participate in the DOLE Kapatiran Work Improvement for Small Enterprise (WISE)-TAV Program (Department Advisory No. 06, dated 07 March 2011) and/or in the Incentivizing Compliance Program (Department Order No. 115-11).

Section 36. Contracting or subcontracting arrangements in the Construction and Other Industries. Contracting or subcontracting arrangements in the Construction Industry, under the licensing coverage of the Philippine Construction Accreditation Board (PCAB), shall be covered by the applicable provisions of these Rules and shall continue to be governed by Department Order No. 19, Series of 1993 (Guidelines Governing the Employment of Workers in the Construction Industry); Department Order No. 13, Series of 1998 (Guidelines Governing the Occupational Safety and Health in the Construction Industry); and DOLE-DPWH-DILG-DTI and PCAB Memorandum of Agreement-Joint Administrative Order No. 1, Series of 2011 (on coordination and harmonization of policies and programs on occupational safety and health in the construction industry).

In industries covered by a separate regulation of the DOLE or other government agency, contracting or subcontracting therein shall be governed by these Rules unless expressly provided otherwise.

Section 37. Prohibition on DOLE officials or employees. Any official or employee of the DOLE or its attached agencies is prohibited from engaging or having any interest in any contracting or subcontracting business.

Section 38. Non-impairment of existing contracts; Non-diminution of benefits. Subject to the provisions of Articles 106 to 109 of the Labor Code, as amended, the applicable provisions of the Civil Code and existing jurisprudence, nothing herein shall impair the rights or diminish the benefits being enjoyed by the parties to existing contracting or subcontracting arrangements.

The effectivity of Certificates of Registration acquired under Department Order No. 18, Series of 2002, issued on 21 February 2002, shall be respected until expiration.

Section 39. Supersession. All rules and regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor and Employment inconsistent with the provisions of these Rules are hereby superseded.

Section 40. Separability Clause. If any provision or portion of these Rules are declared void or unconstitutional, the remaining portions or provisions hereof shall continue to be valid and effective.

Section 41. Effectivity. This Department Order shall be effective fifteen (15) days after completion of its publication in a newspaper of general circulation.

Manila, Philippines, 14 November 2011.

ROSALINDA DIMAPILIS-BALDOZ
Secretary
 ---------------------------

On 14 November 2011, the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) issued Department Order No. 18-A, which becomes effective fifteen (15) days after completion of its publication in a newspaper of general circulation. Considering that Department Order 18-A was published on 19 November 2011, it shall take effect on 4 December 2011.


What is contracting or subcontracting?
“Contracting” or “subcontracting” refers to an arrangement whereby a principal agrees to put out or farm out with a contractor the performance or completion of a specific job, work or service within a definite or predetermined period, regardless of whether such job, work or service is to be performed or completed within or outside the premises of the principal.
Contracting or subcontracting shall be legitimate if all the following circumstances concur:
1. The contractor must be registered in accordance with these Rules and carries a distinct and independent business and undertakes to perform the job, work or service on its own responsibility, according to its own manner and method, and free from control and direction of the principal in all matters connected with the performance of the work except as to the results thereof;

2. The contractor has substantial capital and/or investment; and

3. The Service Agreement ensures compliance with all the rights and benefits under Labor Laws. A “service agreement” refers to the contract between the principal and contractor containing the terms and conditions governing the performance or completion of a specific job, work or service being farmed out for a definite or predetermined period.

What is “substantial capital”?
“Substantial capital” refers to paid-up capital stocks/shares of at least Three Million Pesos (P3,000,000.00) in the case of corporations, partnerships and cooperatives; in the case of single proprietorship, a net worth of at least Three Million Pesos (P3,000,000.00). What constitutes “substantial capital” previously vary, as fixed by the court, as there was no specific threshhold provided under the law or the implementing guidelines.
It is also important to note that the registration fee is Twenty-Five Thousand Pesos (P25,000.00).

Prohibition on labor-only contracting
While the law recognizes contracting and subcontracting arrangements, in prohibits labor-only contracting. It is important, therefore, to know the differences between the two types of contracting.

What is labor-only contracting?
There are two general criteria to determine the existence of labor-only contracting. There is labor-only contracting when:

1. The contractor does not have substantial capital or investments in the form of tools, equipment, machineries, work premises, among others, and the employees recruited and placed are performing activities which are usually necessary or desirable to the operation of the company, or directly related to the main business of the principal within a definite or predetermined period, regardless of whether such job, work or service is to be performed or completed within or outside the premises of the principal; or

2. The contractor does not exercise the right to control over the performance of the work of the employee.

What are the other prohibited acts?
In addition to the prohibition on labor-only contracting, the new issuance also declared as contrary to law the contracting out of jobs, works or services when not done in good faith and not justified by the exigencies of the business, including the following:

1. Contracting out of jobs, works or services when the same results in the termination or reduction of regular employees and reduction of work hours or reduction or splitting of the bargaining unit.

2. Contracting out of work with a “cabo”, which refers to a person or group of persons or to a labor group which, in the guise of a labor organization, cooperative or any entity, supplies workers to an employer, with or without any monetary or other consideration, whether in the capacity of an agent of the employer or as an ostensible independent contractor.

3. Taking undue advantage of the economic situation or lack of bargaining strength of the contractor’s employees, or undermining their security of tenure or basic rights, or circumventing the provisions of regular employment, in any of the following instances:

(i) Requiring them to perform functions which are currently being performed by the regular employees of the principal; and

(ii) Requiring them to sign, as a precondition to employment or continued employment, an antedated resignation letter; a blank payroll; a waiver of labor standards including minimum wages and social or welfare benefits; or a quitclaim releasing the principal, contractor or from any liability as to payment of future claims.

4. Contracting out of a job, work or service through an in-house agency.

5. Contracting out of a job, work or service that is necessary or desirable or directly related to the business or operation of the principal by reason of a strike or lockout whether actual or imminent.

6. Contracting out of a job, work or service being performed by union members when such will interfere with, restrain or coerce employees in the exercise of their rights to self-organization as provided in Art. 248 (c) of the Labor Code, as amended.

7. Repeated hiring of employees under an employment contract of short duration or under a Service Agreement of short duration with the same or different contractors, which circumvents the Labor Code provisions on Security of Tenure.

8. Requiring employees under a subcontracting arrangement to sign a contract fixing the period of employment to a term shorter than the term of the Service Agreement, unless the contract is divisible into phases for which substantially different skills are required and this is made known to the employee at the time of engagement.

9. Refusal to provide a copy of the Service Agreement and the employment contracts between the contractor and the employees deployed to work in the bargaining unit of the principal’s certified bargaining agent to the sole and exclusive bargaining agent (SEBA).
10. Engaging or maintaining by the principal of subcontracted employees in excess of those provided for in the applicable Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) or as set by the Industry Tripartite Council (ITC).

What happens if there’s a finding that labor-only contracting exists?
A finding by competent authority of labor-only contracting shall render the principal jointly and severally liable with the contractor to the latter’s employees, in the same manner and extent that the principal is liable to employees directly hired by him/her. On the other hand, a finding of commission of any of the prohibited activities renders the principal the direct employer of the employees of the contractor or subcontractor.

What happens if an independent contractor is not registered with the DOLE?
It is mandatory for all persons or entities, including cooperatives, acting as contractors, to register with the Regional Office of the DOLE where it principally operates. Failure to register shall give rise to the presumption that the contractor is engaged in labor-only contracting.

Source: http://attyatwork.com/dole-issues-new-rules-on-contracting/


Monday, October 24, 2011

Law & Theatre Enmeshed

The PROSECUTION TEAM with the legal luminary DEAN LEONEN, our professor in Evidence.
I was holding the rubber shoe (our Object Evidence)

Yesterday was the finale of my Finals Season, 1st semester AY 2011-2012, and it was one of the best experiences I had in my lawschool life.

Evidence - is a subject in lawschool and considered as the crown of Remedial Law. Without the "Rules of Evidence"  - we cannot prove anything for every evidence that we need to prove in court must be in accordance to the Rules of Court - mandated by the Supreme Court.

I am still a student and all I am exposed to are cases, books and codals. However yesterday, the Dean showed us that there is indeed a big difference between studying and memorizing the books, cases and theories and putting them in practical application.

Yesterday marked my first experience as a trial lawyer  as part of our Final Exam under the legal luminary Dean Leonen who acted as the presiding Judge.

Our team, was the prosecution and our case was based on People v. Berame, a 1976 case penned by Chief Justice Fernando. Through this assigned case, we need to make our own pleadings, affidavits and arguments in prosecuting the accused Domiciano Berame.

I came in LATE! I arrived at 3:20pm (We were scheduled at 3:00pm).


Reason? I oveslept for I had a sleepless night reading books and mastering my direct & re-direct examination.  Upon arrival, our Public Prosecutor (May Marquez) was already direct examining my witness so she had to pause.  I had to approach the bench and ask Judge Dean Leonen if I can repeat the final offer of the prosecution.


Dean Leonen was kind enough to say "Yes". And so, my intro came this way (remembering GOOD DICTION, STAGE PROJECTION, LOUD & A CLEAR VOICE - and my years as an orator/declamator in my gradeschool and highschool were rekindled) :


PROS CORPUZ: We are offering the testimony of the witness, as an eyewitness to the incident leading to his father’s death, to prove:

·           the material allegations in the Information, specifically, that he personally witnessed his father being shot several times by herein accused DOMICIANO BERAME alias DOMING on the eve of April 13, 1966

·                     that he saw the circumstances leading to the shooting incident; 

·                    that he saw how the accused holding a gun, specifically a .38 caliber pistol

·                    That he saw the accused together with another man who both ran immediately after the incident; 

·                    to identify the accused in open court, as the same person who shot his father;

·                    to identify the Sinumpaang Salaysay or Sworn statement which he executed on April 13, 1966

·                    and for other related purposes Your Honor. 

Judge:            Proceed.

PROS CORPUZ: Mr.  Witness, do you know the deceased in this case, QUIRICO MANINGO?
W: Yes.  
PROS CORPUZ:  How do you know him?
W: He is my father.  He raised me as a single father since my mother died of liver cancer when I was 5 years old. 
PROS CORPUZ: Where is your mother?
W: She is dead. 
PROS CORPUZ: Do you have siblings?
W: None. I am the only child.

Suddenly the DEFENSE TEAM objects...
DEFENSE BAGUISI: Objection, your Honor. The question is irrelevant.

PROS CORPUZ: But your honor, the reason why I am asking that question is that there are only 2 members of the family present in the crime scene! I want to know why there are only 2 family members present, that is why I am asking these questions!

JUDGE LEONEN, smiling and nodding at me said, "The objection is overruled. The counsel may proceed with her questioning.

My ears were clapping when Dean Leonen said this. LOL! (He never smiles when I recite in class, and my recitations sucked!) Then I continued, but the defense again interrupted...

DEFENSE BAGUISI: You honor, may we request the counsel to lower her voice because this might scare/affect the witnesses (or words to that effect).

Then I answered back...

PROSEC CORPUZ: Your honor, in answer to that objection, I would like to manifest that this is the normal volume of my speaking voice, but I'll try my best to lower it as much as I can. ;)

To which Dean Leonen replied, "I will allow the counsel to speak in such tone/volume of voice. "

Again I was sided by the Judge!


My happy figurative smile was beyond my ears. I continued my direct-examination and finally ended  by making my witness Jayvee Camiling (as Danilo S. Maningo, son of the murdered victim) identify the Sworn Statement he executed.

Jayvee is the one wearing stripes while Aldrin is our other witness


I realized that NOTHING beats preparation. An actor must never enter the stage unrehearsed.  Similarly, a lawyer should never come in the courtroom unprepared.  I made the title of this blog "Law and Theatre Enmeshed" because in trial, there are theatrics involved

Look confident, act confident.  I remember my Criminal Law 2 Professor, Ildefonso Jimenez said, "Never ever show the Judge that you are not sure of what you are saying. Even if you really aren''t sure, don't show it!  Always look confident!" - I will never ever forget those words in class in relation to a classmate who was mumbling and lacking confidence while reciting.

I also remember a statement in a blogpost of Atty. Ted Te, my Criminal law 1 Professor to speak clearly and audibly.  The "stage projection and voice projection" are very important.  I remember this when I read one of his first Vinculum Juris blog posts a few years back, particularly his no. 8 & 10 pointers (Emphasis in bold and brown colors supplied by me), to wit:

Telling stories

Many lawyers consider direct examination boring; I used to, when I was starting out. Part of the reason was all those lawyer movies where the most exciting stuff happens during cross examination. When I started to really handle cases, I realized just how exciting--and important--direct examination is.

Direct examination is that part of trial where a story is told, particularly your client's. What spells the difference is how effective you are on direct examination.

A good story is one that holds the interest of the listener; and the most important listener in that court room is the Judge. The challenge is how to hold the judge's interest. Effective direct examination ensures that your client's story will be told and will be told well.

Here are 10 tips for effective--and, yes, exciting--direct examination.

1. Come up with a theory of your case. A theory is not necessarily the cause of action but it must incorporate your cause of action. Your theory is the most plausible explanation of what really happened and why the court should rule in your client's favor. (T. Mauet, Fundamentals of Trial Technique [1988]) A good theory takes into account all the facts--good and bad--and weaves these facts together into an explanation that the judge will find logical and plausible.

2. Present the judge with an image. A noted trial lawyer during his time, former Senator Jose W. Diokno, clearly well-ahead of his time, very wisely commented that "it is not enough as the law book tells you to have a theory of your case. You must also have an image of your case–something that appeals to the reason and sense of justice of the judge, something that would make him say, 'Indeed, this person is right and if the law isn’t that way, maybe I can interpret it so that it will be that way.'” (Jose Manuel I. Diokno, Jose W. Diokno on Trial: Techniques and Ideals of the Filipino Lawyer [2007])

Both your theory and image should be simple, logical, consistent with human experience, provable by the evidence you have and strong enough to withstand your opponent's own theory and image. Remember O.J. Simpson and the gloves and Johnnie Cochran's by-now classic rhyme, "if it don't fit, you must acquit"? That was theory and image coming together, powerfully. Of course, we all know what happened to that trial and to O.J.

3. Determine which witnesses will establish your theory and in what order you will present them. Knowing who to present during trial is almost as important as which questions to ask the witness during trial. Of course, if you are fortunate enough to have eyewitnesses or a complainant who can testify, this will not require much thought. But we don't always get these witnesses, as frequently, we get witnesses who can only testify to one, but not every, part of your theory. Starting with the best witnesses will determine how effectively the theory and image can be presented. One quick and simple rule of thumb in determining who to present: start strong, end strong.

4. Ask the best questions. The most effective direct examinations involve the lawyer asking all the best questions. The best questions are the simplest, shortest and most comfortable (at least to the lawyer) questions he is capable of asking. There are two parts to this: first, ask the best questions during your interview with the client or witness and second, based on that interview, ask the best questions during the trial.

5. Know what your witness will say and how s/he will say it. A traditional cross-examiner's tactic is to rattle the witness by asking, off the bat, if the witness talked to you, his/her counsel, before testifying. What this question seeks to instill in the witness is a sense of irregularity if s/he had, indeed, spoken with counsel. In truth, there is nothing unethical or wrong with speaking with your witness before the trial; on the contrary, it would be irresponsible for counsel to not speak with the witness before presenting the witness. What is unethical would be for counsel to tell the witness what to say. During the preparations for his/her testimony, you should ask the witnesses to answer your questions based on how they understand your questions--without commenting on or reacting to their answers at first. This will allow you to see what the witness will say and how s/he will say it.

6. Use the 5Ws,1H. Who. What. Where. When. Why. How. Not necessarily in this order, though. The advantage of using the 5Ws, 1H is that you will rarely be accused of asking leading questions on direct examination.

7. Learn to loop your questions. "Looping" is the practice of using the witness' previous answer as the premise for your next question. For instance, "You said that you were at (place and time), what were you doing there? Two advantages of "looping" your questions are: (1) you will hardly ever be objected to on the ground of "no basis" and (2) your witness' testimony and story will become very familiar to the judge because specific details will be repeated.

8. Use your voice and body well. What spells the difference between boring and exciting direct examination is frequently how you sound and how you look when asking your questions. Be conscious of how loud (or soft) your voice is, how comprehensible (or incomprehensible) your words are when speaking in public. Be conscious of body language--particularly yours. Rehearse your speaking voice, inflection, tone and even posture and body movements. Know when to move around a lot and when not to. For instance, standing perfectly still while a witness tears up on the stand will focus the attention on the witness, not on you.


9. Prepare any documents you need to present before the trial. Use an Exhibit Guide and an Exhibit List. If you are marking any documents, put small tabs or post its with the proposed marking on the documents; if you have many documents, make sure they are all separately stapled or clipped. Being aware of the Best Evidence Rule, make sure you have the originals and photocopies; if you do not have the originals, make sure you have legible copies and make a note to yourself to ask questions to lay the basis for secondary evidence. Make use of clear books or clear files to separate documents you will be presenting and those that will remain in your file.

10. End confidently and well. Before saying, "that's all, your honor", take about 10 seconds to quickly go over your outline or questions to make sure that you have covered everything you wanted. Check points you have covered and make sure to ask questions on the points that are not checked. After asking the last question, allow about 2 seconds from the witness' answer before nodding confidently and declaring, "that's all, your honor." 


So yes, there is theatre in law. Theatrics are involved.  Drama, stage presence and projection are involved. 


"Law" and "Theatre" are indeed intertwined. 

PROSECUTION: Conrad Lacsina, Al Hajim, Mylene Marquez & Me

Before I end my post, I would like to thank my PROSECUTION DREAM TEAM
PROSEC. MARQUEZ
PROSEC. HAJIM
PROSEC. LACSINA
PROSEC. CORPUZ

I had the most fun experience this semester with these people. With the guidance of Conrad (Prosec. Lacsina) and Ate May (Prosec. Marquez), I and the rest of the team, together with our witnesses would never have done well.  Though our 50% Final Exam for Evidence (Moot Court) was nerve-wracking and caused us sleepless nights and anxiety attacks - and we made few mistakes - Dean Leonen guided us and gave pointers how to correct them. 

It was a GREAT learning experience.

Special thanks to:

****Our WITNESSES - who all did well and sacrificed their time though they had other obligations and final exams as well. Special mention to Jayvee Camiling (my witness, who had the longest script). Maraming salamat!

****My MOM, who is always my saviour and guiding light - was fortunately in Manila to help me with rush orders for Naomi’s Kitchen chocolates that coincided with my “hell week” - my moot court and finals season. I love you mommy!

*** MY DAD - who coached me, gave me pointers and prayed for me (while in Ilocos Norte) as we communicate via cellphone and email

*** Atty. LEA DOMINGO-CABBARUBIAS- my good friend, mentor, former boss at PAO for her brilliant suggestions and pieces of advice.

***Lastly, thank you Lord for allowing me to go through this finale of my finals season.
“I can do all things through Christ who gives me strength” ` Philippians 4:13